Cezar Gabriel Papoe vs Axel Herberg Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 May at 09:48 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Gabriel Papoe vs A. Herberg

ROU
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Papoe 1 - 0 Herberg
They have played 3 sets in total, with Cezar Gabriel Papoe winning 2 and Axel Herberg winning 1. The last match between Cezar Gabriel Papoe and Axel Herberg was at the M25 Satu Mare, 28-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Cezar Gabriel Papoe getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Papoe | 1 |
| Herberg | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Satu Mare(05-28-25)
C. G. Papoe vs A. Herberg H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0% (0-0) | Career Total W/L | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. G. Papoe vs A. Herberg Match Preview:
- Papoe has a stronger second serve performance, winning 36.89% of points in recent form compared to Herberg's 32.41%. Could this give Papoe an edge in maintaining service games?
- Herberg excels in return games, securing 57.28% of their opponent's second serve points, a stark contrast to Papoe's 41.49%.
- When returning first serves, Papoe slightly outperforms Herberg, winning 36.74% of points compared to Herberg's 34.17%.
- Under pressure, both players are nearly matched in breakpoint saving, with Herberg at 41.67% and Papoe at 41.46%.
- Papoe has a superior match win rate this past year, boasting 65.71% compared to Herberg's 37.5%.
- Clay is the best surface for both players, however, Papoe's 64% win rate is significantly higher than Herberg's 32%.
- In the context of tournament levels, Papoe has a consistent streak, winning 65.71% of matches at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, while Herberg achieves only 39.47% win rate.
- Herberg has faced tougher opponents on average, with an average opponent rank of 141.5, compared to Papoe's average opponent rank of 243.6.
- In deciding sets, Papoe's 78% success rate greatly exceeds Herberg's 50%, suggesting a resilience in close matches.
- Break point conversion favors Papoe, who has converted 61.9% of opportunities, whereas Herberg has converted 54.17%.
Editorial Prediction (May 28, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match between Herberg and Papoe presents an interesting clash based on their recent performances and strengths.
Papoe demonstrates a notable advantage in both second serve performance and match-winning consistency. Despite Herberg's ability to perform robustly in return games, Papoe's resilience in pressure situations, particularly regarding break point conversion, cannot be overlooked.
Both players excel on clay; however, Papoe's overall stronger win rate on this preferred surface enhances their position. Additionally, Papoe's track record in deciding sets indicates a psychological toughness that could prove decisive in a tight match.
Given these factors, Papoe appears to have the edge over Herberg, making them the likely winner of the upcoming match.
Cezar Gabriel Papoe vs Axel Herberg Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. G. Papoe vs A. Herberg H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:45:46 | Average Match Time | 2:45:46 |
| 67% (67/100) | 1st Serve % | 65% (53/82) |
| 51% (34/67) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (26/53) |
| 48% (16/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (9/29) |
| 60% (9/15) | Break Pts Won % | 54% (7/13) |
| 57% (47/82) | Return Points Win % | 50% (50/100) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. G. Papoe Recent Matches Played
A. Herberg Recent Matches Played

C. G. Papoe vs A. Herberg Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0/0) | YTD Win/Loss | 31.40% (38/83) |
| 0% (0/0) | Sets Win/Loss | 34.57% (93/176) |
| 0% (0/0) | Games Win/Loss | 42.23% (1041/1424) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 14.29% (1/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 32.46% (37/77) |
| 0 | Aces Total | 6 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 46 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 0 | Average Opponent Rank | 203.08 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 63% (306/484) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (166/306) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (58/178) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (27/51) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 45% (225/503) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 31.93% (38/81) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 31% (38/121) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (7/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 37% (10/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (41/32) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (41/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (80/6) |